<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thank You for Commenting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogresourcesonline.com/2008/02/01/thank-you-for-commenting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogresourcesonline.com/2008/02/01/thank-you-for-commenting/</link>
	<description>Make Easy Money Online&#124;Earn Money At Home</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 20:17:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: James Mann</title>
		<link>http://blogresourcesonline.com/2008/02/01/thank-you-for-commenting/comment-page-1/#comment-206</link>
		<dc:creator>James Mann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogresourcesonline.com/2008/02/01/thank-you-for-commenting/#comment-206</guid>
		<description>Well the first few thank you&#039;s I received were fine but they do get to be annoying and once that happens I think of them as spam.

Perhaps if a little message came up directly after posting a comment that said thanks and get it over with. 

I really don&#039;t post comments to be thanked anyways. The same as I don&#039;t post comments just to say &#039;great post&#039;. That just puts me in a bad mood. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well the first few thank you&#8217;s I received were fine but they do get to be annoying and once that happens I think of them as spam.</p>
<p>Perhaps if a little message came up directly after posting a comment that said thanks and get it over with. </p>
<p>I really don&#8217;t post comments to be thanked anyways. The same as I don&#8217;t post comments just to say &#8216;great post&#8217;. That just puts me in a bad mood. <img src='http://blogresourcesonline.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neena</title>
		<link>http://blogresourcesonline.com/2008/02/01/thank-you-for-commenting/comment-page-1/#comment-202</link>
		<dc:creator>Neena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 22:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogresourcesonline.com/2008/02/01/thank-you-for-commenting/#comment-202</guid>
		<description>Heather,
The one time email is key - and might even go unnoticed as being an auto-response. It becomes annoying if a you, as a commenter, receive the same email after every comment that you write.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heather,<br />
The one time email is key &#8211; and might even go unnoticed as being an auto-response. It becomes annoying if a you, as a commenter, receive the same email after every comment that you write.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neena</title>
		<link>http://blogresourcesonline.com/2008/02/01/thank-you-for-commenting/comment-page-1/#comment-201</link>
		<dc:creator>Neena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 22:07:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogresourcesonline.com/2008/02/01/thank-you-for-commenting/#comment-201</guid>
		<description>Wayne,
I think a personalized auto-response is certainly better than a &quot;thank you, subscribe to my blog&quot; response. And as I said to Heather, if your audience has responded favorably, then it works for you and there is no reason to change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wayne,<br />
I think a personalized auto-response is certainly better than a &#8220;thank you, subscribe to my blog&#8221; response. And as I said to Heather, if your audience has responded favorably, then it works for you and there is no reason to change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather Masson</title>
		<link>http://blogresourcesonline.com/2008/02/01/thank-you-for-commenting/comment-page-1/#comment-200</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather Masson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 22:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogresourcesonline.com/2008/02/01/thank-you-for-commenting/#comment-200</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t found any problems with the comment relish either Wayne.  Guess maybe you&#039;re right in that it&#039;s in the way you word it.  Also it&#039;s a one time email, I think that makes a difference as well. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t found any problems with the comment relish either Wayne.  Guess maybe you&#8217;re right in that it&#8217;s in the way you word it.  Also it&#8217;s a one time email, I think that makes a difference as well. <img src='http://blogresourcesonline.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neena</title>
		<link>http://blogresourcesonline.com/2008/02/01/thank-you-for-commenting/comment-page-1/#comment-199</link>
		<dc:creator>Neena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 22:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogresourcesonline.com/2008/02/01/thank-you-for-commenting/#comment-199</guid>
		<description>@Sales,
I am with you on that one. I have not tried an auto-responder on my sites and have no plans to do so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Sales,<br />
I am with you on that one. I have not tried an auto-responder on my sites and have no plans to do so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne Liew</title>
		<link>http://blogresourcesonline.com/2008/02/01/thank-you-for-commenting/comment-page-1/#comment-198</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne Liew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 13:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogresourcesonline.com/2008/02/01/thank-you-for-commenting/#comment-198</guid>
		<description>OK, this post gave me a head shot since I do use Comment Relish to send out a canned Thank You e-mail.

Well, how will it be if the e-mail is written in a way whereby it don&#039;t seem to be a canned one. You can see, a canned mail will normally have two points: 1. Thank you, 2. Subscribe to my blog.

I think a canned e-mail which are written with no effort makes the blog looks cheap but what if effort had been placed?

Anyway, I don&#039;t think such mails sent to my readers have caused problems to them though as I have seen replies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, this post gave me a head shot since I do use Comment Relish to send out a canned Thank You e-mail.</p>
<p>Well, how will it be if the e-mail is written in a way whereby it don&#8217;t seem to be a canned one. You can see, a canned mail will normally have two points: 1. Thank you, 2. Subscribe to my blog.</p>
<p>I think a canned e-mail which are written with no effort makes the blog looks cheap but what if effort had been placed?</p>
<p>Anyway, I don&#8217;t think such mails sent to my readers have caused problems to them though as I have seen replies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Making Sales Making Money</title>
		<link>http://blogresourcesonline.com/2008/02/01/thank-you-for-commenting/comment-page-1/#comment-197</link>
		<dc:creator>Making Sales Making Money</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 05:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogresourcesonline.com/2008/02/01/thank-you-for-commenting/#comment-197</guid>
		<description>Ive tried it both ways and no longer use it, Id rather develop the relationship through posts</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ive tried it both ways and no longer use it, Id rather develop the relationship through posts</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neena</title>
		<link>http://blogresourcesonline.com/2008/02/01/thank-you-for-commenting/comment-page-1/#comment-196</link>
		<dc:creator>Neena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 16:18:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogresourcesonline.com/2008/02/01/thank-you-for-commenting/#comment-196</guid>
		<description>David,
I hadn&#039;t considered the angle of breaking the comment thread. Keeping the discussion going right on the blog keeps the readers coming back. 

Another strike against auto-responders.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David,<br />
I hadn&#8217;t considered the angle of breaking the comment thread. Keeping the discussion going right on the blog keeps the readers coming back. </p>
<p>Another strike against auto-responders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neena</title>
		<link>http://blogresourcesonline.com/2008/02/01/thank-you-for-commenting/comment-page-1/#comment-195</link>
		<dc:creator>Neena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 16:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogresourcesonline.com/2008/02/01/thank-you-for-commenting/#comment-195</guid>
		<description>Heather,
I am not familiar with the comment relish plugin. But if you have had good feedback from your audience then it is doing its job!

I wonder if the make up of the audience makes a difference. Non-bloggers or new bloggers would probably appreciate an auto response more than a seasoned commentator who might look upon such response as spam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heather,<br />
I am not familiar with the comment relish plugin. But if you have had good feedback from your audience then it is doing its job!</p>
<p>I wonder if the make up of the audience makes a difference. Non-bloggers or new bloggers would probably appreciate an auto response more than a seasoned commentator who might look upon such response as spam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Bradley</title>
		<link>http://blogresourcesonline.com/2008/02/01/thank-you-for-commenting/comment-page-1/#comment-194</link>
		<dc:creator>David Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 14:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogresourcesonline.com/2008/02/01/thank-you-for-commenting/#comment-194</guid>
		<description>Yep, those autocomment responders are cheesy, also commenters often reply to this in email rather than posting a follow-up comment, so the discussion thread breaks. Same happens with comment subscribe I find too...

db</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, those autocomment responders are cheesy, also commenters often reply to this in email rather than posting a follow-up comment, so the discussion thread breaks. Same happens with comment subscribe I find too&#8230;</p>
<p>db</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
